Frederick Douglass the Founder of the Civil Rights Movement

     At this time it is well to look back at the greats
in American history to understand and reflect on
the talents and challenges of the leaders of today.
It is said that Frederick Douglass was, by his actions and
writings, the founder of America’s civil rights movement. Here,
from an informative Wikipedia article, we read part of the story
of the great Frederick Douglass.
Frederick Douglass (born Frederick Augustus Washington
Bailey), (c. February 1818-February 20, 1895) was an African-
American social reformer, abolitionist, orator, writer, and
statesman. After escaping from slavery in Maryland, he became
a national leader of the abolitionist movement in
Massachusetts and New York, gaining note for his dazzling
oratory] and incisive antislavery writings. In his time, he was
described by abolitionists as a living counter-example to
slaveholders’ arguments that slaves lacked the intellectual
capacity to function as independent American citizens.
Northerners at the time found it hard to believe that such a
great orator had once been a slave.
Douglass wrote several autobiographies. He described his
experiences as a slave in his 1845 autobiography, Narrative of
the Life of Frederick Douglass, an American Slave, which
became a bestseller, and was influential in promoting the cause
of abolition, as was his second book, My Bondage and My
Freedom (1855). After the Civil War, Douglass remained an
active campaigner against slavery and wrote his last
autobiography, Life and Times of Frederick Douglass. First
published in 1881 and revised in 1892, three years before his
death, it covered events during and after the Civil War.
Douglass also actively supported women’s suffrage, and held
several public offices. Without his approval, Douglass became
the first African American nominated for Vice President of the
United States as the running mate and Vice Presidential
nominee of Victoria Woodhull, on the Equal Rights Party ticket.
Douglass was a firm believer in the equality of all peoples,
whether black, female, Native American, or recent immigrant.
He was also a believer in dialogue and in making alliances
across racial and ideological divides and in the liberal values of
the American Constitution. When radical abolitionists, under
the motto “No Union With Slaveholders,” criticized Douglass’
willingness to dialogue with slave owners, he famously replied:
“I would unite with anybody to do right and with nobody to do
One biographer argues:
“The most influential African American of the
nineteenth century, Douglass made a career of
agitating the American conscience. He spoke and
wrote on behalf of a variety of reform causes:
women’s rights, temperance, peace, land reform,
free public education, and the abolition of capital
punishment. But he devoted the bulk of his time,
immense talent, and boundless energy to ending
slavery and gaining equal rights for African
Americans. These were the central concerns of his
long reform career. Douglass understood that the
struggle for emancipation and equality demanded
forceful, persistent, and unyielding agitation. And
he recognized that African Americans must play a
conspicuous role in that struggle. Less than a
month before his death, when a young black man
solicited his advice to an African American just
starting out in the world, Douglass replied without
hesitation, “Agitate! Agitate! Agitate!”

Fondly submitted for the Diversity Committee

Posted in Uncategorized | 1 Comment

The Affordable Care Act and Its Impact on Women and Children–

From the beginning of the discussion of the Affordable Care Act (ACA), there was a good bit of talk in some circles, that it was for the “others.” Sadly we are drifting into a society where there is a focus on a “them versus us” mentality. Named “Obamacare” by detractors, there was an attempt to manipulate thinking in such a way that if you didn’t like the person for whom it was named, you didn’t like the plan. Not everyone knew about the plan itself. Here in an article by Ara Siegel, the plan is described. Note, as it is being attacked by detractors, how much the plan benefits women and children who, in fact, should be considered as “all of us.” There are no “others.”
7 Ways Obamacare Impacts Women and Families
You’ve heard about the Affordable Care Act, but what changes affect you, your family or your caregiver?
There’s been a lot of talk about the Affordable Care Act (ACA) or “Obamacare.” But when it comes down to it, how many of us can get past the bureaucracy and legal jargon to truly understand if this law can help our families? The ACA provides benefits for women and families (maternity coverage!) that might help you. And considering women make about 80% of health care decisions for their families, we’re decoding Obamacare so you don’t have to. Here are seven things to consider:
1. Access–The ACA created a mandate that generally all employers with over 50 full-time employees (over 30 hours/week) provide health coverage for their workers. If you do not receive insurance though an employer then you can purchase it on the Health Insurance Marketplace, where you can choose a private health plan that fits your needs as well as learn if you qualify for certain subsidies.
The ACA also allows states to expand Medicaid eligibility, meaning more access to quality care for all kinds of families, such as those with disabled children, or who are low-income (one in five Americans gets their health care through Medicaid).
2. Affordability–Under the ACA’s new 80/20 rules, at least 80 cents of every dollar insurance companies spend must go towards your healthcare or improvements to care. Women and families who could not afford healthcare in the past have new access to affordable coverage through the Health Insurance Marketplace which offers a range of plans in every state. And if insurance companies want to raise your premiums by more than 10 percent, they must publicly justify their actions.
3. Young Adults–Young adults can now stay on their parents’ health insurance plan until age 26.
4. Gender and Illness Up-Charges–Insurers can no longer put a lifetime cap on how much care they will pay if you get sick, and health insurers can no longer charge you more because you are a woman. Before the Affordable Care Act was law, a majority of states had best-selling plans that engaged in gender rating. For example, a 25-year-old woman could be expected to pay 81 percent more for health insurance than a man, even for a plan that did not include maternity coverage.
5. Pre-Existing Conditions–It is now illegal for insurance companies to deny coverage to people with pre-existing conditions, such as having had breast cancer or being pregnant. Previously, a woman without health insurance might get pregnant or find a lump and not be able to receive coverage because she had a “pre-existing condition.”
6. Preventive Health Benefits–Most health plans are now required to cover preventive services without making you pay a copay or deductible. Such services include things like: well-woman visits, mammograms, FDA-approved birth control, vaccinations for your child, domestic violence counseling, testing for gestational diabetes and breastfeeding supplies. And all plans offered through the Marketplace must cover a package of essential health benefits, which include maternity and newborn care.
7. Maternity Care–All insurance plans sold on the Insurance Marketplace cover maternity care. Just a few years ago, 68 percent of enrollees in individual market plans lacked maternity coverage, considering that in 2012, the average hospital bill–for each of the 3 million plus women who delivered babies without complications–was more than $23,000.
Navigating the healthcare system can be a challenge, but it’s extremely important to be educated about your rights when it comes to one of the most important things: your health and the health of your family.
Fondly submitted,
The Diversity Committee

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

When You Read This America Will Have Been Changed

This is written before the November 2016 Presidential Election in a time of great uncertainty. In the face of this uncertainty it is well to remember the abiding principles that make America great and give us stability as a nation. In the Constitution Daily there is a wonderful article that speaks of the peaceful transfer of power in American government. I have quoted this article now for its learned and comforting message. “Nothing less than a miracle”: The Constitution and the peaceful transition of power, October 21, 2016 by Nicandro Iannacci (an excerpt)–
“Our grand experiment in republican self-government depends on good-faith cooperation. Under the First Amendment, we can protest the government and criticize the outcome of an election, but if we lose the argument, we must accept the results. And that’s what Americans have always done. In his first Inaugural address, President Ronald Reagan praised our collective achievement:
‘To a few of us here today this is a solemn and most momentous occasion, and yet in the history of our nation it is a commonplace occurrence. The orderly transfer of authority as called for in the Constitution routinely takes place, as it has for almost two centuries, and few of us stop to think how unique we really are. In the eyes of many in the world, this every 4-year ceremony we accept as normal is nothing less than a miracle.”
Wishing you all a calm and peaceful holiday season.
Fondly submitted,
For the Diversity Committee

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

As November Approaches

As November approaches and with it an
election that may be the most important in
recent history, for our nation and the world, a
few thoughts about leadership are in order. An
interesting book was written by Al Gini and Ronald M. Green
(©2013 John Wiley & Sons, Inc.) The book is titled: 10 Virtues
of Outstanding Leaders: Leadership & Character
The authors list 10 traits vital to leadership for us to
consider. Here are the traits which are certainly worth
reflecting upon at this precarious time in our nation’s history.
The top 10 virtues of outstanding leaders are deep honesty,
moral courage, moral vision, compassion and care, fairness,
intellectual excellence, creative thinking, aesthetic sensitivity,
good timing, and deep selflessness.
 Leadership is more than a title, occupation, or superior
knowledge or skills—it is a non-autocratic relationship
between leaders and followers who have common
interests and objectives. Leaders have power, but they are
committed to their values and high ethical standards.
 Character is the key defining characteristic of leadership.
Ethical leadership stems from good character.
 Good character requires integrity and a sense of duty and
 Ethical leaders put the needs of their followers (or
employees) and customers ahead of their own needs.
 Their greatest concern is the common good.
 The best leaders exhibit most of the key moral virtues, but
they do not need to exhibit all of them.
This list is certainly not all inclusive. Few lists of traits are.
The traits mentioned are none the less vital and worthy of our
consideration. One would be proud to see these traits in our
offspring. Perhaps that is a good test in our decision making. Is
our candidate one with behaviors and traits we would like to
see in our children and grandchildren. No candidate is perfect
but high ethical behavior and ethical standards are essential to
assuming such an important leadership role. Clearly a leader is
not one who fosters hate and division. In our time such a leader
can have a terrible capacity to destroy. That is something, I
think, few of us want.
Fondly submitted,
For the Diversity Committee

Posted in Uncategorized | 1 Comment

If We Are Only for Ourselves, Who are We?

“As women, we must stand up for
ourselves . . . We must stand up for each
other . . . We must stand up for justice for all.”—
Michelle Obama, first lady of the United States
Hillel says, “If I am not for myself, who will be for
me? But if I am only for myself, who am I” If not
now, when?” Ethics of rhe Fathers, 1:14
As we approach the November 2016 presidential
election, there are voices in our society fanning the
flames of exceptionalism and particularism.
Exceptionalism defines a group as unique in a way
that it often suggests it to be superior. In
particularism the group supports goals helpful to
itself without regard to the effect on others.
The quotes from Michelle Obama and Hillel the
Elder cited above reflect another view. As we
prepare ourselves to vote in November, let us
consider the wisdom of these individuals in guiding
our best reflection. It is so important in these
perilous times
Fondly submitted,
The Diversity Committee

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

In Search of Clean Hands

Post World War II the United Nations proposed thirty rights that were universal necessities for every human around the world. In an effort to prevent the same cleansing actions that had been orchestrated by Hitler, the members tried to ensure that no matter which country of origin, all people could have quality of life. It was adopted by the United Nations in 1948. Even during WWII the Allies had adopted the Four Freedoms-freedom of speech, religion, from fear, and from want. So, why in 2016, even in the United States, a country that claims to be the most progressive, most democratic, most accommodating country in the world, do we still have to talk about fair treatment and opportunity for all?

February 15th 2008 the U.S. National Academy of Engineering announced the challenges for 21st century engineers. Experts from around the world met and revealed a list of improvements that could vastly improve the way the entire global community lives. These grand challenges follow: make solar energy economical; provide energy from fusion; develop carbon sequestration methods; manage the nitrogen cycle; provide access to clean water; restore and improve urban infrastructure; advance health informatics; engineer better medicine; reverse-engineer the brain; prevent nuclear terror secure cyberspace; enhance virtual reality; advance personalized learning; and engineer the tools of scientific discovery.

It is doubtful that the American representatives to the engineering conference could have predicted that within 8 years, the citizens of Flint, Michigan would need their help as badly as any developing country in the world. 100,000 people and their offspring have been made irrelevant for a few dollar’s savings. They have been exposed to lead poison because a decision was made to stop purchasing water from Detroit. There was documentation available indicating that the Flint River had 19 times the recommended level of lead presence. Three people have been indicted, with a promise of the attorney general that more people will be named. It is doubtful that watching these people go to trial is a real consolation to families who are worried about the future of their relatives.

These stories of greed and disregard for welfare of communities have been in the news before. By 1962, when Rachel Carson published Silent Spring, we knew that contaminating our water led to disastrous results. Erin Brockovich , was based on a real situation that was investigated in the early 90s. It was not just a movie starring Julia Roberts. There is a reason we don’t use lead based paints any more, and asbestos is used with great caution.

One quote from the engineering academy reports, sums up what I have been trying to say. It states, “A world divided by wealth and poverty, health and sickness, food and hunger, cannot long remain a stable place for civilization to thrive.”   If we are not altruistically driven to make the world more comfortable for the masses because it is a righteous thing to do, perhaps our personal survival and the lives of our own families might provide the impetus to challenge decision makers to not support any actions they would not deem safe and productive for their own children. Will we again allow a few people at the middle and lower rungs of the hierarchy to take the blame when the welfare of an entire community of 100,000 has been compromised? What happened to the buck stops here, Rick Snyder, and all the others in leadership positions?

Posted in Uncategorized | 1 Comment

Is America’s Poor Held to a Higher Standard?

I had an interesting conversation with a parent almost two weeks ago. The discussion was why the scout troop was doing a fundraiser to buy shoes for children in another country when there are so many children in our country who do not have these necessities. This parent’s response was that even though her mother didn’t have wealth, she had the foresight to position her child in programs that would make it possible for her to have a brighter future. Basically, American children were blamed for their parent’s lack of vision and planning. My family did the same for me, but are the children, whose parents don’t provide those opportunities, to be denied help?

Americans often do missionary work in other countries—it is almost expected.   Yet, when asked why the charity doesn’t begin at home, the many chances available in the United States are sited, and those who have not availed themselves of those opportunities are viewed as parasites that are undeserving.

I remember my grandfather’s church raising money for mission work. The congregation was not a wealthy one, yet the members felt it their duty to help those in faraway places who were less fortunate. As we know by now, some of the people in the countries where the funds are shipped were not more impoverished, and in the 21st century, many are quite wealthy. The poor live among them, but quite often the successful neighbors don’t make it their responsibility to uplift the people in their own nations.

Even more striking, is no matter how poor Americans might be, the well to do in other countries don’t think they have a calling to help some of America’s poor. The thought is those in “the land of opportunity can help themselves” if they would but get with the program. The charity does not flow both ways across the oceans. I really came to grips with that way of thinking when I was in an African history seminar this past summer. In questioning African graduate students about their encounters with average Americans and poor people, the consistent response was that there were no regular interactions. The groups were not going out of their way to see how bad some conditions were in this country for themselves. They weren’t concerned, and we were in Michigan. They were here to acquire an education and that was the focus. The scholarships and opportunities that had been provided to them were not questioned, as the guests held onto the notion that those in the US who were not getting ahead were responsible for their fates. The person, who understood this thinking better, cleared up my concern and confusion about this perspective.

She is a coordinator for student teachers. In that capacity, she has the opportunity to see regular Americans, not just fellow graduate students and people who share her academic and economic status. The many people who come to this country for advanced degrees are here for a specific goal, and they rarely encounter the masses in their world that is centered on the ivy tower. Though some may have begun life poor, and are experiencing the chance of a lifetime, they are usually not necessarily concerned about the poor here because they are invisible.

After giving her list of experiences in the non-profit sector the scout mother and the leader continued to explain how important it was that the girls learn to help others. I could barely suppress my disappointment that they were perpetuating the myth that unfortunate Americans are that way because they failed to take advantage of opportunities, but those from other countries were more deserving because they hadn’t begun life here, so they are working hard for change. Not every person in every country we support with our donations, has maximized on every available opportunity, and in some places there are local people who could help, but don’t.   Not all people outside the US collaborate, and support each other in a fair and equitable way. Just looking at human trafficking and exploitation in the manufacturing sectors, and we know this.

So why are struggling Americans held to a different standard? If I could, I would try to ensure that every child has the opportunities listed in the Universal Declaration of Human Rights! Not one time was it mentioned in this document that the exception was Americans because they had better odds.   Having knowledge of America’s history, it is clear that this is not necessarily true. Our fortunes are still dependent upon a bit of luck—as in the luck of being born into one family or in one location versus another. Fortunes have shifted with economic ups and downs. Our kids deserve shoes too, and our children can learn to help by contributing to the local community too—not just abroad. These efforts will not be reciprocated by people who are invited to this country for upward mobility, because they too believe the stereotypes, and are indifferent to acquiring a different perspective.


Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment